TITLE |
PUBLISHED |
WEBINAR: How Standardized Terminology can Accelerate Global Regulatory Performance |
June 15, 2022 |
WEBINAR: Benchmarking Survey - Is EU CTR Driving Tighter Clinical & Regulatory Integration? |
March 30, 2022 |
November 11, 2021 | |
March 25, 2021 | |
VIDEO: PhlexSubmission Electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) Software Introduction |
|
March 11, 2021 | |
July 14, 2021 | |
November 20, 2020 | |
October 29, 2020 | |
WEBINAR: Innovation Tour Survey Results Panel: Future Trends in TMF, IDMP, and eCTD |
May 30, 2021 |
ARTICLE: Prepare yourself for 2020 – Global regulatory update |
December 6, 2019 |
ARTICLE: Common Promotional Submissions in eCTD Errors and How to Avoid Them |
May 28, 2019 |
October 30, 2018 | |
ARTICLE: Australian regional specification – eCTD Version 3.1 |
June 14, 2020 |
November 28, 2018 | |
ARTICLE: eCTD Brief: The Deep Dive into Electronic Submissions |
November 1, 2017 |
October 5, 2017 | |
August 11, 2017 | |
February 24, 2015 |
Automation
Outsourcing
TMF
Migrating Trial Master File (TMF) data is a fairly common occurrence, usually driven by one or more of the following scenarios: Implementing a new electronic Trial Master File (eTMF) system
Based on extensive work helping trial sponsors and Contract Research Organizations (CROs) implement Trial Master File (TMF) best practices, Phlexglobal’s experts repeatedly encounter teams struggling
In a poll of nearly 100 TMF professionals during a recent Phlexglobal webinar, “Lowering your TMF Risk Temperature: Real-world Use Cases and Lessons Learned,” more than half of the respondents were
UK: +44 (0) 1494 720420
US: +1 (484) 324-7921
Poland: +48 81 45 46 132
Germany: +49 89 23514741
E-Mail: info@phlexglobal.com